Subject: Re: [PATCH] move eeh_add_device_tree_late()

From: Mark Fasheh <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:59:22 -0800

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:35:55AM -0600, John Rose wrote:
> Good catch, Mark.
Heh, thanks.

> Commit 827c1a6c1a5dcb2902fecfb648f9af6a532934eb introduced a new
> function that calls eeh_add_device_late() implicitly.  This patch
> reorders the two functions in question to fix the compile error.  This
> might be preferable to exposing eeh_add_device_late() in eeh.h.
Hmm, you still left the EXPORT_SYMBOL(eeh_add_device_late) and you didn't
make eeh_add_device_late() static. Shouldn't you do that if you don't want
to make it accessible outside of eeh.c?
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
[email-masked]