From: Doug Maxey <dwm@maxeymade•com>
To: Paul Nasrat <pnasrat@redhat•com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add FSL SEC node to documentation
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:27:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603252227.k2PMRJ57026730@falcon30.maxeymade.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142976221.2751.22.camel@enki.eridu>
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:23:41 EST, Paul Nasrat wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 13:28 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 12:25 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> > On Mar 20, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
>> > > Have you consulted with any other vendors regarding these
>> > > properties? I know
>> > > there is no IEEE1275 binding for these sorts of devices, but we can
>> > > at least
>> > > attempt to standardize it (even in the absence of the Open Firmware
>> > > Working
>> > > Group)...
>> >
>> > Beyond the device_type, I'm not sure if there is much more one could
>> > standardize one. The other fields that Kim spec'd are either generic
>> > OF fields (reg, interrupts, etc.) or specific to the Freescale devices.
>>
>> The device_type and compatible properties are exactly what I'm talking
>> about.
>
>The Working Group lists still exist but are pretty dead. I agree we
>really want to ensure that both OF based and dtc based new hardware is
>consistent. I'm not sure how we want to do this, but we can document in
>Documentation and then use eg SLOF to mock out the OF interfaces and
>create proposals and kick some life into the OF working group.
Sorry for the delayed reply, my procmail filter was pumping mails to
the old list name without telling me. :)
Other than IBM, Motorola, and possibly Sun, what groups are using
OFW on new platforms anymore?
Power.org may be a vehicle to publish.
The Power TSC leader indicated a willingness to look into a process to
get out some purely internal bindings (at the moment) that _really_
need some fresh air to flourish.
++doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-25 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 1:59 [PATCH] powerpc: Add FSL SEC node to documentation Kim Phillips
2006-03-21 2:14 ` Hollis Blanchard
2006-03-21 17:48 ` Kim Phillips
2006-03-21 18:21 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-22 1:10 ` Kim Phillips
2006-03-22 4:09 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-03-21 18:25 ` Kumar Gala
2006-03-21 19:28 ` Hollis Blanchard
2006-03-21 21:23 ` Paul Nasrat
2006-03-25 22:27 ` Doug Maxey [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-22 20:39 Kim Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603252227.k2PMRJ57026730@falcon30.maxeymade.com \
--to=dwm@maxeymade$(echo .)com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=pnasrat@redhat$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox