Subject: Re: [PATCH] use msleep() for RTAS delays

From: Arnd Bergmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:09:34 +0200

On Thursday 01 June 2006 07:39, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > rtas_call_waitbusy(...);
> That's a good idea...

Do we also need an atomic version of that? Maybe there are
places where we actually need to call a slow rtas call
under a spinlock.

At the very least, rtas_call_waitbusy() should have a
might_sleep() in it to find those places.

	Arnd <><