Subject: Re: [PATCH] mark PCI resource with start 0 as unassigned

From: Alan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:15:12 +0000

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:25:04 +0100
Segher Boessenkool <[email-masked]> wrote:

> But 0 _is_ a valid PCI I/O address.  Do we now have to start
> using "virtual I/O addresses", analogue to the IRQ situation,
> or can these bad assumptions be fixed instead?

Send patches to Bartlomiej now he is back in circulation.

Alan