public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: olof@lixom•net (Olof Johansson)
To: Luke Browning <lukebr@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>,
	cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs•org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 64K page support for kexec
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:43:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070424194348.GA8371@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1177439513.24866.5.camel@luke-laptop>

Hi,

Didn't see this posted before, but see some comments below.


Thanks,

Olof
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:31:53PM -0300, Luke Browning wrote:

> +#define LP_SHIFT	12
> +#define LP_BITS		8
> +#define LP_MASK(i)	((((1 << LP_BITS) - 1) >> (i)) << LP_SHIFT)

Seems to me that something like:
#define LP_MASK(i)	((0xff >> (i)) << LP_SHIFT)

is considerably easier to read.

> +static void hpte_decode(hpte_t *hpte, unsigned long slot, 
> +			int *psize, unsigned long *va)
> +{
> +	unsigned long hpte_r = hpte->r;
> +	unsigned long hpte_v = hpte->v;
> +	unsigned long avpn;
> +	int i, size, shift, penc, avpnm_bits;
> +		
> +	if (!(hpte_v & HPTE_V_LARGE))
> +		size = MMU_PAGE_4K;
> +#if 0
> +	else if (hpte_v & 0x4000000000000000UL)
> +		size = MMU_PAGE_16G;
> +#endif

No ifdefs please. Just take it out if it's not needed.

> +	else if (!(hpte_r & LP_MASK(0)))
> +		size = MMU_PAGE_16M;
> +	else {
> +		for (i = 0; i < LP_BITS; i++) {
> +			if ((hpte_r & LP_MASK(i+1)) == LP_MASK(i+1))
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		penc = LP_MASK(i+1) >> LP_SHIFT;

No need for braces. Also, why iterate from 0 to LP_BITS if you're doing i+1 everywhere?

> +		for (size = MMU_PAGE_64K; size < MMU_PAGE_16M; size++) {

This assumes that the page sizes are ordered. Why not just iterate from
0 to MMU_PAGE_COUNT?

> +			if (!mmu_psize_defs[size].shift)
> +				continue;

A comment to the effect of "unused entries have a shift value of 0" could be
useful.

> +			if (penc == mmu_psize_defs[size].penc)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
> -		vpi = ((va >> 28) ^ pteg) & htab_hash_mask;
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME, this could be made more efficient by storing the type 
> +	 * of hash algorithm in mmu_psize_defs[].  The code below assumes 
> +	 * the number of bits in the va representing the offset in the
> +	 * page is less than 23. This affects the hash algorithm that is
> +	 * used. When 16G pages are supported, a new hash algorithm
> +	 * needs to be provided.  See POWER ISA Book III.
> +	 *
> +	 * The code below works for 16M, 64K, and 4K pages.
> +	 */

A BUG_ON() when other sizes are hit could be a good idea?

> +	shift = mmu_psize_defs[size].shift;
> +	if (mmu_psize_defs[size].avpnm)
> +		avpnm_bits = __ilog2_u64(mmu_psize_defs[size].avpnm) + 1;
> +	else
> +		avpnm_bits = 0;
> +	if (shift - avpnm_bits <= 23) {
> +		avpn = HPTE_V_AVPN_VAL(hpte_v) << 23;
> +
> +		if (shift < 23) {
> +			unsigned long vpi, pteg;
> +
> +			pteg = slot / HPTES_PER_GROUP;
> +			if (hpte_v & HPTE_V_SECONDARY)
> +				pteg = ~pteg;
> +			vpi = ((avpn >> 28) ^ pteg) & htab_hash_mask;
> +			avpn |= (vpi << mmu_psize_defs[size].shift);
> +		}
> +	}
> +#if 0
> +	/* 16GB page hash, p > 23 */
> +	else {

Same thing here w.r.t. ifdefs

>  
> -		va |= vpi << PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	}
> +#endif
>  
> -	return va;
> +	*va = avpn;
> +	*psize = size;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -374,8 +420,6 @@ static unsigned long slot2va(unsigned lo
>   *
>   * TODO: add batching support when enabled.  remember, no dynamic memory here,
>   * athough there is the control page available...
> - *
> - * XXX FIXME: 4k only for now !
>   */
>  static void native_hpte_clear(void)
>  {
> @@ -383,6 +427,7 @@ static void native_hpte_clear(void)
>  	hpte_t *hptep = htab_address;
>  	unsigned long hpte_v;
>  	unsigned long pteg_count;
> +	int psize;
>  
>  	pteg_count = htab_hash_mask + 1;
>  
> @@ -408,8 +453,9 @@ static void native_hpte_clear(void)
>  		 * already hold the native_tlbie_lock.
>  		 */
>  		if (hpte_v & HPTE_V_VALID) {
> +			hpte_decode(hptep, slot, &psize, &hpte_v);
>  			hptep->v = 0;
> -			__tlbie(slot2va(hpte_v, slot), MMU_PAGE_4K);
> +			__tlbie(hpte_v, psize);

Using hpte_v as variable name is a bit misleading.  avpn or va would be
a better variable name.


-Olof

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-24 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-24 18:31 [PATCH] 64K page support for kexec Luke Browning
2007-04-24 19:43 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2007-04-24 22:50   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-24 23:07     ` Olof Johansson
2007-04-25  5:48       ` Milton Miller
2007-04-25 19:35     ` [PATCH v2] powerpc: " Luke Browning
2007-04-25 22:19       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-26 15:28         ` Luke Browning
2007-04-27  4:36           ` [PATCH v3] " Milton Miller
2007-04-27 14:42             ` Luke Browning
2007-04-27 16:51               ` Milton Miller
2007-04-27 16:22             ` [PATCH v4] " Luke Browning
2007-04-27 16:59               ` Milton Miller
2007-04-27 17:30                 ` Luke Browning
2007-04-27 18:23                   ` Haren Myneni
2007-04-29  5:35                     ` Milton Miller
2007-04-29  8:30                   ` Paul Mackerras
2007-04-29  9:31                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-29 13:27                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-29 22:49                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-26  7:15       ` [PATCH v2] " Olof Johansson
2007-04-24 22:48 ` [PATCH] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-25 13:06   ` Luke Browning
2007-04-25 22:11     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-26 22:23 [PATCH v3] powerpc: " Luke Browning
2007-04-26 22:32 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-02 14:19   ` [PATCH v4] " Luke Browning
2007-05-03 13:45     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070424194348.GA8371@lixom.net \
    --to=olof@lixom$(echo .)net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=lukebr@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox