public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:45:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706291545.53890.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18052.42546.78964.805791@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Friday 29 June 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> It turns out that with Arnd's patches we now get "-mcpu=3Dpowerpc64" on
> the command line, and that means that gcc *doesn't* put "-mppc64" the
> as command line, and as barfs on the 64-bit instructions. =A0That's
> presumably a gcc bug, but we'll have to work around it. =A0I think the
> best thing is just to not put the -mcpu=3Dpowerpc64 in CFLAGS when no
> specific CPU is selected.

I can't reproduce the problem here unfortunately. My idea was to always
pass _some_ -mcpu=3D flag, in order to make sure it does not use
an inappropriate default, e.g. when the compiler is built for a default
for power4 but you actually want to build a power3 kernel.

Would it work reliably if we switch the arguments to
'-mcpu=3Dpowerpc64 -m64' instead of '-m64 -mcpu=3Dpowerpc64'? That
might be better than taking it out entirely.

	Arnd <><

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-29 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-29  5:24 Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch Kumar Gala
2007-06-29  6:26 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-06-29  7:04   ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-29  9:15   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-29  9:31     ` Paul Mackerras
2007-06-29  9:51       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-29 13:45   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2007-06-29 14:44     ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-29 16:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-29 16:09         ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-29 16:10         ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-29 15:22   ` Andreas Schwab
2007-06-30  6:57     ` Paul Mackerras
2007-06-30  8:10       ` Andreas Schwab
2007-06-30  8:14         ` Paul Mackerras
2007-06-30  8:49           ` Andreas Schwab
2007-06-30 10:57       ` Alan Modra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-23 21:01 Kumar Gala
2007-07-24  2:56 ` Kumar Gala
2007-07-25  6:43 ` Zang Roy-r61911
2007-07-10  5:42 Kumar Gala
2007-05-15 22:20 Kumar Gala
2007-05-17 10:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-17 12:05   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-17 12:58     ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-17 13:00   ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-18  6:15     ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-18 16:51       ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-17 22:38 Kumar Gala
2007-02-17 22:44 ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-13 22:16 Kumar Gala
2007-02-08 21:50 Kumar Gala
2007-02-08 21:52 ` Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch Kumar Gala
2007-02-07  7:51 Kumar Gala
2006-12-08  8:51 Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706291545.53890.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox