Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] [POWERPC] mpc8568mds.dts: fix PCI/PCIe nodes

From: Anton Vorontsov <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:08:49 +0400

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:58:00PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
>>>> PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-)
>>>
>>>    Of course. But shouldn't those be the subnoses of the "soc" type node?
>>
>> Nope. PCI's ranges = <>; isn't in the SOC address space.
>>
>> Valentine Barshak posted a patch titled "[RFC] [PATCH] PowerPC: Add 64-bit
>> phys addr support to 32-bit pci" that started using of_translate_address()
>> for ranges, and of_translate_address() will not work if PCI placed in the
>> SOC node. Not sure if that patch applied or not, though.
>
> I'm confused, what's the actual issue with PCI that this patch addresses?

Which patch? Valentine's or mine under the subject? Don't know about the
former, but mine patch is pretty obvious: your commit
5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c moved PCI nodes out of soc node,
but you forgot to change regs = <>, thus instead of e000a000/e0008000,
kernel used a000/8000 for accessing PCI ccsr registers.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: [email-masked]
backup email: [email-masked]
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2