From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@Oracle•com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation•org,
"\"Zhang Wei\" rdunlap@xenotime•net" <Wei.Zhang@freescale•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docbook: fix fatal rapidio yet again (and more to come)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:11:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080430151149.063920cf.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18456.60948.463017.139935@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Thu, 1 May 2008 08:09:24 +1000 Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
>
> > > Odd. I thought Paul had picked up a docbook RapidIO patch from you in
> > > the latest merge round.
> > >
> >
> > Well it's more than "a" patch. The six-week-old patch series is:
> >
> > rapidio-add-memory-mapping-driver-to-rapidio.patch
> > rapidio-add-rapidio-space-allocation-bitmap-arithmetic.patch
> > rapidio-add-fsl-rapidio-controller-memory-ops-functions.patch
> > rapidio-add-the-rapidio-master-port-maintance-and-doorbell-window-to-space-resources.patch
> > rapidio-add-rapidio-proc-fs-for-memory-mapping-debugging.patch
> > rapidio-add-the-memory-mapping-support-in-rionet-driver.patch
> > rapidio-fix-docbook-references.patch
> > rapidio-fix-kernel-doc-problems.patch
>
> What happened is that you (Andrew) sent them on to me pretty much
> unexamined. I took a look at them and dropped one of them because it
> created a new /proc file. I asked Kumar to look at them and he had
> issues with another three of the patches, and dropping those meant
> that all the following ones (including the fix-kernel-doc one)
> wouldn't apply, so I dropped them too. I applied the rest and sent
> them to Linus.
>
> > (seems that I forgot to cc Jeff on the rionet change too).
>
> Yeah. I nearly dropped that one too. I probably should have. :)
>
> > Oh well. If nobody puts their hand up in the next 24 hours or so I'll just
> > send it all in to Linus.
>
> Please don't. At this stage I think the best thing is for Kumar to
> talk to Zhang Wei (they both work for Freescale, so that should be
> possible in theory :) and get him to rework the remaining patches as
> required for inclusion in 2.6.27.
Just to be clear, the docbook changes shouldn't wait for 2.6.27.
There's no need for that.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804292009000.18219@shark.he.net>
2008-04-30 18:35 ` [PATCH] docbook: fix fatal rapidio yet again (and more to come) Andrew Morton
2008-04-30 18:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-30 19:01 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-30 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-30 20:31 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-30 22:09 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-30 22:11 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-04-30 22:14 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-30 22:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-30 23:45 ` [PATCH] rapidio: fix current kernel-doc notation Randy Dunlap
2008-05-01 3:57 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080430151149.063920cf.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=Wei.Zhang@freescale$(echo .)com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox