public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
To: Eric Munson <ebmunson@us•ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack•org, libhugetlbfs-devel@lists•sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:41:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730014139.39b3edc5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1216928613.git.ebmunson@us.ibm.com>

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:17:10 -0700 Eric Munson <ebmunson@us•ibm.com> wrote:

> Certain workloads benefit if their data or text segments are backed by
> huge pages. The stack is no exception to this rule but there is no
> mechanism currently that allows the backing of a stack reliably with
> huge pages.  Doing this from userspace is excessively messy and has some
> awkward restrictions.  Particularly on POWER where 256MB of address space
> gets wasted if the stack is setup there.
> 
> This patch stack introduces a personality flag that indicates the kernel
> should setup the stack as a hugetlbfs-backed region. A userspace utility
> may set this flag then exec a process whose stack is to be backed by
> hugetlb pages.
> 
> Eric Munson (5):
>   Align stack boundaries based on personality
>   Add shared and reservation control to hugetlb_file_setup
>   Split boundary checking from body of do_munmap
>   Build hugetlb backed process stacks
>   [PPC] Setup stack memory segment for hugetlb pages
> 
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c |    6 +
>  arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c       |   11 ++
>  fs/exec.c                     |  209 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c          |   52 +++++++----
>  include/asm-powerpc/hugetlb.h |    3 +
>  include/linux/hugetlb.h       |   22 ++++-
>  include/linux/mm.h            |    1 +
>  include/linux/personality.h   |    3 +
>  ipc/shm.c                     |    2 +-
>  mm/mmap.c                     |   11 ++-
>  10 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

That all looks surprisingly straightforward.

Might there exist an x86 port which people can play with?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-30  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-28 19:17 [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks Eric Munson
2008-07-28 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/5 V2] Align stack boundaries based on personality Eric Munson
2008-07-28 20:09   ` Dave Hansen
2008-07-28 19:17 ` [PATCH 2/5 V2] Add shared and reservation control to hugetlb_file_setup Eric Munson
2008-07-28 19:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] Split boundary checking from body of do_munmap Eric Munson
2008-07-28 19:17 ` [PATCH 4/5 V2] Build hugetlb backed process stacks Eric Munson
2008-07-28 20:37   ` Dave Hansen
2008-07-28 19:17 ` [PATCH 5/5 V2] [PPC] Setup stack memory segment for hugetlb pages Eric Munson
2008-07-28 20:33 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks Dave Hansen
2008-07-28 21:23   ` Eric B Munson
2008-07-30  8:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-30 15:04   ` Eric B Munson
2008-07-30 15:08   ` Eric B Munson
2008-07-30  8:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-30 17:23   ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-30 17:34     ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-30 19:30       ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-30 19:40         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-30 20:07         ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 10:31           ` Mel Gorman
2008-08-04 21:10             ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-05 11:11               ` Mel Gorman
2008-08-05 16:12                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-05 16:28                   ` Mel Gorman
2008-08-05 17:53                     ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-06  9:02                       ` Mel Gorman
2008-08-06 19:50                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-07 16:06                           ` Mel Gorman
2008-08-07 17:29                             ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-11  8:04                               ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-31  6:04       ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31  6:14         ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-31  6:26           ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 11:27             ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-31 11:51               ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 13:50                 ` Mel Gorman
2008-07-31 14:32                   ` Michael Ellerman
2008-08-06 18:49       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080730014139.39b3edc5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ebmunson@us$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=libhugetlbfs-devel@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox