Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Demultiplexing SIGTRAP signal -v2

From: Gabriel Paubert <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:53:58 +0200

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:55:01PM +0530, Srinivasa Ds wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 17:00:01 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > applied to [the new topic] tip/core/signal, thanks Srinivasa! There
> > > are some other pending x86 signal changes already, so i based
> > > tip/core/signal on tip/x86/signal.
> >
> > -tip testing found the following build error with the attached config:
> >
> 
> Ingo, Reproduced build break issue with your config on tip tree. It was a costly overlook 
> to miss one header file. I included it in this patch and tested it out.
> 
> 
> Currently a SIGTRAP can denote any one of below reasons.
> 	- Breakpoint hit
> 	- H/W debug register hit
> 	- Single step
> 	- Signal sent through kill() or rasie()

Typo: s/rasie/raise/

No strong opinion about the patch, but more info is usually better.

	Regards,
	Gabriel