Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpu: idle state framework for offline CPUs.

From: Pavel Machek <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:08:18 +0200

Hi!

> > Also, approaches such as [1] can make use of this
> > extended infrastructure instead of putting the CPU to an arbitrary C-state
> > when it is offlined, thereby providing the system administrator a rope to hang
> > himself with should he feel the need to do so.
> I didn't see the reason why administrator needs to know which state offline cpu
> should stay. Don't know about powerpc side, but in x86 side, it appears deepest
> C-state is already preferred.
> 

Agreed, deepest c-state is always best, there's no need to make it configurable.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html