From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba•org>
To: mingo@elte•hu, peterz@infradead•org, benh@kernel•crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/numa: Remove duplicate RECLAIM_DISTANCE definition
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:33:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725023426.408998418@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110725023311.175792493@samba.org
We have two identical definitions of RECLAIM_DISTANCE, looks like
the patch got applied twice. Remove one.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba•org>
---
Index: linux-2.6-work/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-work.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h 2011-07-25 12:15:33.059921510 +1000
+++ linux-2.6-work/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h 2011-07-25 12:15:46.750174446 +1000
@@ -19,16 +19,6 @@ struct device_node;
#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10
/*
- * Before going off node we want the VM to try and reclaim from the local
- * node. It does this if the remote distance is larger than RECLAIM_DISTANCE.
- * With the default REMOTE_DISTANCE of 20 and the default RECLAIM_DISTANCE of
- * 20, we never reclaim and go off node straight away.
- *
- * To fix this we choose a smaller value of RECLAIM_DISTANCE.
- */
-#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10
-
-/*
* Avoid creating an extra level of balancing (SD_ALLNODES) on the largest
* POWER7 boxes which have a maximum of 32 nodes.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 2:33 [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/numa: Enable SD_WAKE_AFFINE in node definition Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched: Allow SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN to be overridden Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/numa: Increase SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN to 32 Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/numa: Disable NEWIDLE balancing at node level Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2011-07-25 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 0:19 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-09-20 1:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-09-20 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110725023426.408998418@samba.org \
--to=anton@samba$(echo .)org \
--cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox