From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons•com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman•id.au>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell•com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>,
linux-ia64@vger•kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips•org,
linux-pci@vger•kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de•ibm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google•com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail•com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
sparclinux@vger•kernel.org, linux-s390@vger•kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm•linux.org.uk>,
x86@kernel•org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat•com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons•com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel•com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon•net>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda•com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera•com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons•com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel•com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips•org>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell•com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de•ibm.com>,
linux390@de•ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 02/11] pci: use weak functions for MSI arch-specific functions
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 07:30:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702073037.55a53642@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372726396.17904.1.camel@concordia>
Dear Michael Ellerman,
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:53:16 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:42 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Until now, the MSI architecture-specific functions could be overloaded
> > using a fairly complex set of #define and compile-time
> > conditionals. In order to prepare for the introduction of the msi_chip
> > infrastructure, it is desirable to switch all those functions to use
> > the 'weak' mechanism. This commit converts all the architectures that
> > were overidding those MSI functions to use the new strategy.
>
> The MSI code used to use weak functions, until we discovered they were
> being miscompiled on some toolchains (11df1f0). I assume these days
> we're confident they work correctly.
Hum, interesting. I see from your commit that gcc 4.3.2 was apparently
affected, and gcc 4.3.x is not /that/ old. Bjorn, what's your point of
view on this?
Another option would be to have architecture register some msi_arch_ops
structure, with a set of operations, which I believe is a pattern that
is more widespread in the kernel than weak functions.
Thoughts?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1372686136-1370-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2013-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCHv4 02/11] pci: use weak functions for MSI arch-specific functions Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-02 0:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-02 5:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-07-02 6:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-02 17:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-05 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-05 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-05 21:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-01 13:42 ` [PATCHv4 03/11] pci: remove ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI kconfig option Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-05 21:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-05 21:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-06 13:54 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-06 15:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-06 16:17 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-06 16:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130702073037.55a53642@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons$(echo .)com \
--cc=alior@marvell$(echo .)com \
--cc=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
--cc=bhelgaas@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera$(echo .)com \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons$(echo .)com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons$(echo .)com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon$(echo .)net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=linux@arm$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=maen@marvell$(echo .)com \
--cc=michael@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
--cc=mingo@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips$(echo .)org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda$(echo .)com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox