Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node

From: Joonsoo Kim <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:00:51 +0900

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51:37PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
> Also, given that only ia64 and (hopefuly soon) ppc64 can set
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, does that mean x86_64 can't have
> memoryless nodes present? Even with fakenuma? Just curious.

I don't know, because I'm not expert on NUMA system :)
At first glance, fakenuma can't be used for testing
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES. Maybe some modification is needed.

Thanks.