From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
davidlohr@hp•com, paulus@samba•org, tglx@linutronix•de,
torvalds@linux-foundation•org, mingo@kernel•org
Subject: Re: Tasks stuck in futex code (in 3.14-rc6)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:39:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319160933.GA30295@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140319154705.GB8557@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
> >
> > Infact I can reproduce this if the java_constraint is either node, socket, system.
> > However I am not able to reproduce if java_constraint is set to core.
>
> What's any of that mean?
>
Using the constraint, one can specify how many jvm instances should
participate in the specjbb run.
For example on a 4 node box, I can say 2 jvms per constraint with
constraint set to node and specjbb will run with 8 instances of java.
I was running with 1 jvm per constraint. But when I set the constraint
to node/System, I keep seeing this problem. However if I set the
constraint to core (which means running more instances of java), the
problem is not seen. I kind of guess, the lesser the number of java
instances the easier it is to reproduce.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-19 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-19 15:26 Tasks stuck in futex code (in 3.14-rc6) Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-19 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 16:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2014-03-19 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 18:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 5:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-20 5:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 10:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-20 15:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 16:31 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 20:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-03-20 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 17:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 18:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 19:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 20:20 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-21 4:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-21 5:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-22 2:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-22 3:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140319160933.GA30295@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox