public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux•vnet.ibm.com>,
	aik@ozlabs•ru, benh@kernel•crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 21:49:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806134901.GB6235@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150806045139.GB28524@gwshan>

On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:51:40PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:24:59AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>The alignment of IOV BAR on PowerNV platform is the total size of the IOV
>>BAR. No matter whether the IOV BAR is truncated or not, the total size
>>could be calculated by (vfs_expanded * VF size).
>>
>
>s/VF size/VF BAR size
>
>I think the changelog would be more explicit:
>
>The alignment of IOV BAR on PowerNV platform is the total size of the
>IOV BAR, no matter whether the IOV BAR is extended with number of max
>VFs or number of max PE number (256). The alignment can be calculated

number of max VFs is not correct. This should be
roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs).

Others looks good to me.

>by (vfs_expaned * VF_BAR_size).
>
>>This patch simplifies the pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment() by removing the
>>first case.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c |   14 +++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>index 9b41dba..7192e62 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>@@ -2987,12 +2987,16 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> 						      int resno)
>> {
>> 	struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>-	resource_size_t align, iov_align;
>>-
>>-	iov_align = resource_size(&pdev->resource[resno]);
>>-	if (iov_align)
>>-		return iov_align;
>>+	resource_size_t align;
>>
>>+	/*
>>+	 * On PowerNV platform, IOV BAR is mapped by M64 BAR to enable the
>>+	 * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
>>+	 * BAR should be size aligned.
>>+	 *
>>+	 * This function return the total IOV BAR size if expanded or just the
>>+	 * individual size if not.
>>+	 */
>> 	align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
>> 	if (pdn->vfs_expanded)
>> 		return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
>>-- 
>>1.7.9.5
>>

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-06 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-29  7:22 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR Wei Yang
2015-07-30  1:15 ` Gavin Shan
2015-07-30  5:43   ` Wei Yang
2015-07-31  0:13     ` Gavin Shan
2015-07-31  2:01       ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:24         ` [PATCH V2 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:24           ` [PATCH V2 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR contains non M64 BAR Wei Yang
2015-08-06  4:35             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  6:10               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06  6:57                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  7:47                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 11:07                     ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 14:13                     ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:24                       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 14:10               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:20                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  2:24                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  3:50                     ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  7:14                     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10  1:40                       ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:24           ` [PATCH V2 2/6] powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource Wei Yang
2015-08-06  4:51             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  9:00               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06  9:41                 ` Wei Yang
2015-08-06 10:15                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-07  1:36                     ` Wei Yang
2015-08-06 13:49               ` Wei Yang [this message]
2015-08-07  1:08                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:20             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  9:36               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-06 10:07                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  1:48                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  8:13                     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 10:04             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-07  2:01               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  8:59                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10  1:48                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 4/6] powerpc/powernv: replace the hard coded boundary with gate Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:26             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  9:11               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 5/6] powerpc/powernv: boundary the total vf bar size instead of the individual one Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:28             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 14:03               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:23                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  2:25                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 6/6] powerpc/powernv: allocate discrete PE# when using M64 BAR in Single PE mode Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:36             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 13:41               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:36                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  2:33                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  3:43                     ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  5:44                       ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  5:54                         ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  6:25                           ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07 10:00                           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150806134901.GB6235@richard \
    --to=weiyang@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs$(echo .)ru \
    --cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=gwshan@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox