From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst•de>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux•intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists•01.org,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel•com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn•net>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel•crashing.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba•org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman•id.au>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel•dk>,
"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de•ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de•ibm.com>,
linux390@de•ibm.com, "Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv•linux.org.uk>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@linux•intel.com>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@primarydata•com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst•de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
"Omar Sandoval" <osandov@osandov•com>,
"Boaz Harrosh" <boaz@plexistor•com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@suse•cz>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse•cz>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams•de>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix•de>,
"Gerald Schaefer" <gerald.schaefer@de•ibm.com>,
"Ameen Ali" <ameenali023@gmail•com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle•com>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagig@mellanox•com>,
"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@redhat•com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel•org>,
"Shaohua Li" <shli@fb•com>, "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@canonical•com>,
linux-doc@vger•kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger•kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger•kernel.org,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:19:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150815091950.GA21487@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439484671-15718-8-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:51:11AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Update the annotation for the kaddr pointer returned by direct_access()
> so that it is a __pmem pointer. This is consistent with the PMEM driver
> and with how this direct_access() pointer is used in the DAX code.
IFF we stick to the __pmem annotations this looks good.
That beeing said I start to really dislike them. We don't special
accesors to read/write from pmem, we just need to explicitly commit
it if we want to make it persistent. So I really don't see the need
to treat it special and require all the force casts to and from the
attribute.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-15 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 16:51 [PATCH v2 0/7] dax: I/O path enhancements Ross Zwisler
2015-08-13 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] pmem, dax: have direct_access use __pmem annotation Ross Zwisler
2015-08-13 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-14 16:55 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-08-14 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-15 9:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-15 15:49 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-15 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-08-15 15:44 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-15 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-15 18:05 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-17 20:07 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150815091950.GA21487@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst$(echo .)de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=ameenali023@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=axboe@kernel$(echo .)dk \
--cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
--cc=boaz@plexistor$(echo .)com \
--cc=corbet@lwn$(echo .)net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=david@fromorbit$(echo .)com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse$(echo .)cz \
--cc=jlayton@primarydata$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists$(echo .)01.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical$(echo .)com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
--cc=mszeredi@suse$(echo .)cz \
--cc=osandov@osandov$(echo .)com \
--cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox$(echo .)com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=shli@fb$(echo .)com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=viro@zeniv$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams$(echo .)de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox