Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] powerpc: vio: use dev_groups and not dev_attrs for bus_type

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 21:30:58 +0200

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:22:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The dev_attrs field has long been "depreciated" and is finally being
> removed, so move the driver to use the "correct" dev_groups field
> instead for struct bus_type.
> 
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email-masked]>
> Cc: <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> index 28b09fd797ec..fd6595598662 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> @@ -1537,6 +1537,7 @@ static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", to_vio_dev(dev)->name);
>  }
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
>  
>  static ssize_t devspec_show(struct device *dev,
>  		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> @@ -1545,6 +1546,7 @@ static ssize_t devspec_show(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", of_node_full_name(of_node));
>  }
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(devspec);
>  
>  static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  			     char *buf)
> @@ -1566,6 +1568,7 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "vio:T%sS%s\n", vio_dev->type, cp);
>  }
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(modalias);
>  
>  static struct device_attribute vio_dev_attrs[] = {
>  	__ATTR_RO(name),
> @@ -1573,6 +1576,13 @@ static struct device_attribute vio_dev_attrs[] = {
>  	__ATTR_RO(modalias),
>  	__ATTR_NULL
>  };
> +static struct attribute *vio_dev_attrs[] = {

Hm, this feels wrong, odd that 0-day passed it.  I should be deleting
the above vio_dev_attrs field as well.  Is powerpc really a dead
platform?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h