Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/11] powerpc/powernv: powernv platform is not constrained by RMA

From: Nicholas Piggin <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:17:31 +1000

Remove incorrect comment about real mode address restrictions on
powernv (bare metal), and unnecessary clamping to ppc64_rma_size.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <[email-masked]>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
index 9b87abb178f0..bcdca4144362 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
@@ -162,12 +162,9 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_recoverable_ranges(unsigned long node,
 			sizeof(struct mcheck_recoverable_range);
 
 	/*
-	 * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges. We would be
-	 * accessing them in real mode, hence it needs to be within
-	 * RMO region.
+	 * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges.
 	 */
-	mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc_base(size, __alignof__(u64),
-							ppc64_rma_size));
+	mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc(size, __alignof__(u64)));
 	memset(mc_recoverable_range, 0, size);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < mc_recoverable_range_len; i++) {
-- 
2.11.0