Subject: [PATCH 33/67] dma-direct: reject too small dma masks

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:18:37 +0100

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
---
 include/linux/dma-direct.h |  1 +
 lib/dma-direct.c           | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
index 4788bf0bf683..bcdb1a3e4b1f 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
@@ -42,5 +42,6 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
 		gfp_t gfp, unsigned long attrs);
 void dma_direct_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
 		dma_addr_t dma_addr, unsigned long attrs);
+int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask);
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_DMA_DIRECT_H */
diff --git a/lib/dma-direct.c b/lib/dma-direct.c
index 2e9b9494610c..5bb289483efc 100644
--- a/lib/dma-direct.c
+++ b/lib/dma-direct.c
@@ -123,6 +123,24 @@ static int dma_direct_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
 	return nents;
 }
 
+int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+	if (mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS))
+		return 0;
+#else
+	/*
+	 * Because 32-bit DMA masks are so common we expect every architecture
+	 * to be able to satisfy them - either by not supporting more physical
+	 * memory, or by providing a ZONE_DMA32.  If neither is the case, the
+	 * architecture needs to use an IOMMU instead of the direct mapping.
+	 */
+	if (mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
+		return 0;
+#endif
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static int dma_direct_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
 {
 	return dma_addr == DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR;
@@ -133,6 +151,7 @@ const struct dma_map_ops dma_direct_ops = {
 	.free			= dma_direct_free,
 	.map_page		= dma_direct_map_page,
 	.map_sg			= dma_direct_map_sg,
+	.dma_supported		= dma_direct_supported,
 	.mapping_error		= dma_direct_mapping_error,
 	.is_phys		= true,
 };
-- 
2.14.2