Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:44:56 +0200

> -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
> -bool sev_active(void)
> -{
> -	return is_prot_virt_guest();
> -}
> -
>  bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	return sev_active();
> +	return is_prot_virt_guest();
>  }

Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>