Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function

From: Halil Pasic <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:01:23 +0200

On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:44:56 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]> wrote:

> > -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
> > -bool sev_active(void)
> > -{
> > -	return is_prot_virt_guest();
> > -}
> > -
> >  bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	return sev_active();
> > +	return is_prot_virt_guest();
> >  }
> 
> Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?

Yes we do. With the comment transferred:

Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <[email-masked]>

> 
> Otherwise looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>