Subject: [PATCHv2 26/50] powerpc: Add show_stack_loglvl()

From: Dmitry Safonov <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:38:52 +0000

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email-masked]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email-masked]/T/#u
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email-masked]> (powerpc)
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email-masked]>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index fad50db9dcf2..c1ab7f613da4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -2034,7 +2034,8 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
 
 static int kstack_depth_to_print = CONFIG_PRINT_STACK_DEPTH;
 
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack,
+		       const char *loglvl)
 {
 	unsigned long sp, ip, lr, newsp;
 	int count = 0;
@@ -2059,7 +2060,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
 	}
 
 	lr = 0;
-	printk("Call Trace:\n");
+	printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
 	do {
 		if (!validate_sp(sp, tsk, STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD))
 			break;
@@ -2068,7 +2069,8 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
 		newsp = stack[0];
 		ip = stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
 		if (!firstframe || ip != lr) {
-			printk("["REG"] ["REG"] %pS", sp, ip, (void *)ip);
+			printk("%s["REG"] ["REG"] %pS",
+				loglvl, sp, ip, (void *)ip);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 			ret_addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current,
 						&ftrace_idx, ip, stack);
@@ -2090,8 +2092,9 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
 			struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)
 				(sp + STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD);
 			lr = regs->link;
-			printk("--- interrupt: %lx at %pS\n    LR = %pS\n",
-			       regs->trap, (void *)regs->nip, (void *)lr);
+			printk("%s--- interrupt: %lx at %pS\n    LR = %pS\n",
+			       loglvl, regs->trap,
+			       (void *)regs->nip, (void *)lr);
 			firstframe = 1;
 		}
 
@@ -2101,6 +2104,11 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
 	put_task_stack(tsk);
 }
 
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *stack)
+{
+	show_stack_loglvl(tsk, stack, KERN_DEFAULT);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 /* Called with hard IRQs off */
 void notrace __ppc64_runlatch_on(void)
-- 
2.25.1