Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] test_bitmap: skip user bitmap tests for !CONFIG_SET_FS

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:52:45 +0200

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 09:50:05AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 17/08/2020 à 09:32, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
>> We can't run the tests for userspace bitmap parsing if set_fs() doesn't
>> exist.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>   lib/test_bitmap.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
>> index df903c53952bb9..49b1d25fbaf546 100644
>> --- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
>> +++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
>> @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ static void __init __test_bitmap_parselist(int is_user)
>>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(parselist_tests); i++) {
>>   #define ptest parselist_tests[i]
>>   +#ifdef CONFIG_SET_FS
>
> get_fs() and set_fs() have stubs for when an arch doesn't define them, so I 
> this it would be cleaner if you were using 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SET_FS) 
> && is_user)`instead of an ifdefery in the middle of the if/else.

No, I don't provide stubs in the prep patch, and that has been intentional
as I don't want this to spread much.  test_bitmap would be the only place
where they are somewht useful, and I just hope this test is eventually
getting rewritten to run in a normal user space context where the
uaccess tests can be resurrected.