Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/bitops: Fix possible undefined behaviour with fls() and fls64()

From: Segher Boessenkool <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:37:39 -0500

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 02:05:46PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> fls() and fls64() are using __builtin_ctz() and _builtin_ctzll().
> On powerpc, those builtins trivially use ctlzw and ctlzd power
> instructions.
> 
> Allthough those instructions provide the expected result with
> input argument 0, __builtin_ctz() and __builtin_ctzll() are
> documented as undefined for value 0.

> When the input of fls(x) is a constant, just check x for nullity and
> return either 0 or __builtin_clz(x). Otherwise, use cntlzw instruction
> directly.

That looks good :-)

Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool <[email-masked]>

Segher