public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro•com>
To: x86@kernel•org, linux-riscv@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole•se>,
	linux-s390@vger•kernel.org,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux•ibm.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs•berkeley.edu>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux•ibm.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail•com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux•ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux•intel.com>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti•fi>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat•com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8•de>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive•com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt•com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail•com>,
	openrisc@lists•librecores.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:58:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221014155845.1986223-3-ajones@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014155845.1986223-1-ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Commit 78e5a3399421 ("cpumask: fix checking valid cpu range") has
started issuing warnings[*] when cpu indices equal to nr_cpu_ids - 1
are passed to cpumask_next* functions. seq_read_iter() and cpuinfo's
start and next seq operations implement a pattern like

  n = cpumask_next(n - 1, mask);
  show(n);
  while (1) {
      ++n;
      n = cpumask_next(n - 1, mask);
      if (n >= nr_cpu_ids)
          break;
      show(n);
  }

which will issue the warning when reading /proc/cpuinfo. Ensure no
warning is generated by validating the cpu index before calling
cpumask_next().

[*] Warnings will only appear with DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS enabled.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro•com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail•com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 099b6f0d96bd..de3f93ac6e49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
 {
+	if (*pos == nr_cpu_ids)
+		return NULL;
+
 	*pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
 	if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
 		return &cpu_data(*pos);
-- 
2.37.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-14 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14 15:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning Andrew Jones
2022-10-14 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: " Andrew Jones
2022-10-14 15:58 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2022-10-28  7:48   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: " Andrew Jones
2022-10-28 14:46     ` Yury Norov
2022-10-28 15:03       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-28 15:13         ` Yury Norov
2022-10-28 16:06           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-31  8:06             ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-31  8:58               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-31 10:03                 ` Andrew Jones
2022-11-02 18:44                   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 12:59                     ` Andrew Jones
2022-11-03 15:02                       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 15:34                         ` Andrew Jones
2022-11-03 15:54                           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 16:30                           ` yury.norov
2022-11-03 16:49                             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 17:31                               ` Yury Norov
2022-11-03 23:22                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-15 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Yury Norov
2022-10-27 23:07 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-28  7:40   ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221014155845.1986223-3-ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro$(echo .)com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs$(echo .)berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bp@alien8$(echo .)de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=gor@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole$(echo .)se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists$(echo .)librecores.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt$(echo .)com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive$(echo .)com \
    --cc=shorne@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti$(echo .)fi \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox