Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 28/31] pinctrl: Add support for the Lantic PEF2256 pinmux

From: Herve Codina <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:35:40 +0200

On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:04:56 +0200
Linus Walleij <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Herve,
> 
> thanks for your patch!
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:15 PM Herve Codina <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > The Lantiq PEF2256 is a framer and line interface component designed to
> > fulfill all required interfacing between an analog E1/T1/J1 line and the
> > digital PCM system highway/H.100 bus.
> >
> > This kind of component can be found in old telecommunication system.
> > It was used to digital transmission of many simultaneous telephone calls
> > by time-division multiplexing. Also using HDLC protocol, WAN networks
> > can be reached through the framer.
> >
> > This pinmux support handles the pin muxing part (pins RP(A..D) and pins
> > XP(A..D)) of the PEF2256.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <[email-masked]>
> > Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email-masked]>  
> 
> Nice to see this as a proper pin control driver!
> 
> >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256-regs.h |  65 ++++++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-pef2256.c      | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++++++  
> 
> Do you really need a separate header just for some registers?
> But it's a matter of taste so I'm not gonna complain if you want
> it this way.

Will be move to the .c file in the next iteration.

> 
> > +config PINCTRL_PEF2256
> > +       tristate "Lantiq PEF2256 (FALC56) pin controller driver"
> > +       depends on OF && FRAMER_PEF2256
> > +       select PINMUX  
> 
> select PINCONF

Will be added in the next iteration.

> 
> > +       select GENERIC_PINCONF  
> 
> This brings it in implicitly but I prefer that you just select it.
> 
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*  
> 
> I think SPDX mandates that you start the tag with C99 comments

Already replied by Mark, C style comment is correct -> No change.

> 
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> 
> > +       /* We map 1 group <-> 1 pin */  
> 
> Also known as "the qualcomm trick", but hey: it's fine.
> 
> > +static int pef2256_register_pinctrl(struct pef2256_pinctrl *pef2256)
> > +{
> > +       struct pinctrl_dev      *pctrl;
> > +
> > +       pef2256->pctrl_desc.name    = dev_name(pef2256->dev);
> > +       pef2256->pctrl_desc.owner   = THIS_MODULE;
> > +       pef2256->pctrl_desc.pctlops = &pef2256_pctlops;
> > +       pef2256->pctrl_desc.pmxops  = &pef2256_pmxops;
> > +       if (pef2256->version == PEF2256_VERSION_1_2) {
> > +               pef2256->pctrl_desc.pins  = pef2256_v12_pins;
> > +               pef2256->pctrl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v12_pins);
> > +               pef2256->functions  = pef2256_v12_functions;
> > +               pef2256->nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v12_functions);
> > +       } else {
> > +               pef2256->pctrl_desc.pins  = pef2256_v2x_pins;
> > +               pef2256->pctrl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v2x_pins);
> > +               pef2256->functions  = pef2256_v2x_functions;
> > +               pef2256->nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(pef2256_v2x_functions);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       pctrl = devm_pinctrl_register(pef2256->dev, &pef2256->pctrl_desc, pef2256);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(pctrl)) {
> > +               dev_err(pef2256->dev, "pinctrl driver registration failed\n");
> > +               return PTR_ERR(pctrl);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return 0;  
> 
> You could use
> return dev_err_probe(...);

Indeed, I will change.

> 
> > +       pef2256_reset_pinmux(pef2256_pinctrl);
> > +       ret = pef2256_register_pinctrl(pef2256_pinctrl);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;  
> 
> Or you could use it down here.
> 
> With or without these changes (because they are nitpicks)
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email-masked]>
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Thanks for your comment.

Best regards,
Hervé