Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned

From: Jonathan Cameron <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 17:57:22 +0100

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:40 +0300
Mike Rapoport <[email-masked]> wrote:

> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email-masked]>
> 
> CPU id cannot be negative.
> 
> Making it unsigned also aligns with declarations in
> include/asm-generic/numa.h used by arm64 and riscv and allows sharing
> numa emulation code with these architectures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email-masked]>
Makes sense for both reasons. FWIW given how simple it is.

Maybe worth bringing a few more functions inline with this?
Probably something for another day given we don't care about the
inconsistency for this series.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email-masked]>