public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail•com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel•org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv•linux.org.uk>,
	Andre Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia•com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix•com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux•ibm.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel•org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup•eu>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead•org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs•net>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux•ibm.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse•cz>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria•fr>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger•kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists•infradead.org, linux-s390@vger•kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux•ibm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios•com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman•id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail•com>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag•fr>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt•com>,
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel•org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux•org.uk>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux•ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	x86@kernel•org, Kees Cook <kees@kernel•org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] uaccess: Fix scoped_user_read_access() for 'pointer to const'
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 18:55:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302185510.6b49a025@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjKWi=j_xcMBAi2Hkuut6aNeqXTwOFoMGkHfDA+3WXsgg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:26:31 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 at 06:59, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
> <chleroy@kernel•org> wrote:
> >
> > Can we get this fix merged in 7.0-rc3 so that we can start building 7.1
> > on top of it ?  
> 
> Applied this first patch. I'm not so convinced about the others in the
> series, although people can always try to argue for them..

Patches 2 and 3 seemed a reasonable idea to me.
Removes a lot of code that is only there to make the whole thing work.
The 'with' is a bit of a take on Pascal - but without the 'making the
code completely unreadable' side effect.

I don't do WARN=1 builds, never mind WARN=2 :-)
Although -Wshadow can find real bugs - so I would turn it on and
suffer the annoyances. 

Patch 5 was just what I was experimenting with.
Doing the equivalent change to the non-compat version (IIRC it
uses the (likely) much slower copy_to/from_user() because the
structures match) might even be more sensible.

	David


> 
>               Linus



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-02 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-02 13:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] uaccess: Updates to scoped_user_access() david.laight.linux
2026-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] uaccess: Fix scoped_user_read_access() for 'pointer to const' david.laight.linux
2026-03-02 14:59   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-03-02 17:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2026-03-02 18:55       ` David Laight [this message]
2026-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] compiler.h: Add generic support for 'autoterminating nested for() loops' david.laight.linux
2026-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] uaccess.h: Use with() and and_with() in __scoped_user_access() david.laight.linux
2026-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] uaccess: Disable -Wshadow " david.laight.linux
2026-03-02 15:00   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-03-03  9:12     ` David Laight
2026-03-02 17:17   ` Linus Torvalds
2026-03-05  8:10   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 next 5/5] signal: Use scoped_user_access() instead of __put/get_user() david.laight.linux
2026-03-02 16:07   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260302185510.6b49a025@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@inria$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup$(echo .)eu \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=hca@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=kees@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux$(echo .)org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios$(echo .)com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=pjw@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=svens@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox