Subject: Re: CPCI-405 port (PPC405GP)

From: Dan Malek <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:02:51 -0400

Tom Rini wrote:

> Er, yes.  But if there's nothing specific to the CPCI405, why add in an
> empty file and the

There _must_ be something in that file.  At a minimum it has
to define the board information structure.

	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/