From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom•gr>
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists•linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DF0A4D9.4030603@intracom.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DF0A39D.2090401@intracom.gr>
Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone tell what is the deal with these functions?
^ me
>
>
> consistent_alloc et. al. are very useful to me now that I'm
> cleaning up my QMC driver. But they are exported.
^ not
>
>
> Is there any reason why they are not exported for use by
> modules?
>
> Also they appear to be tied to the PCI bus, a reduntant
> dependancy IMHO.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Pantelis Antoniou
> INTRACOM S.A. Greece
>
> "> I read slashdot because it's so hard to find
> >> anything else intelligent to read.
>
> Keep searching..."
> -- as seen on slashdot --
>
>
>
>
Sigh,
Maybe I should read the mail more before hitting send.
--
Pantelis Antoniou
INTRACOM S.A. Greece
"> I read slashdot because it's so hard to find
>> anything else intelligent to read.
Keep searching..."
-- as seen on slashdot --
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-06 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 13:18 Regarding consistent_alloc Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 13:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou [this message]
2002-12-06 14:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 15:59 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 16:08 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:30 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 18:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:52 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:59 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-06 22:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 0:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-07 12:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 16:53 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-09 9:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-10 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 3:52 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 8:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-11 9:58 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 15:01 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 15:36 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 3:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-11 14:56 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 15:07 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 3:41 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-12 8:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 8:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-12-12 8:37 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 12:56 ` Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC? Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-12 18:28 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-12 20:35 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-13 4:12 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 6:09 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-13 7:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-16 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 4:08 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 16:53 ` "Missing" patches (Was: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc) Tom Rini
2002-12-06 16:56 ` Regarding consistent_alloc Dan Malek
2002-12-06 18:29 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:45 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-07 0:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-06 15:54 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DF0A4D9.4030603@intracom.gr \
--to=panto@intracom$(echo .)gr \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox