Subject: Re: U-Boot and kernel 2.6

From: Pantelis Antoniou <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:03:30 +0300

David Woodhouse wrote:

>On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 09:45 +0300, Meriin Michael-BMM063 wrote:
>
>>Check the bd_t definition, it MUST be the same in u-boot and Linux platform definition.
>>bd_t in Linux is defined in ppcboot.h
>>
>
>We really need to throw this crap away and start using structured tags
>like ARM does.
>
>--
>dwmw2
>
>
>
>
>
>
Or we can parse the u-boot environment which is ascii.
I already do this...

Regards

Pantelis

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/