public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Autran <gautran@mrv•com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades•com>
Cc: "Smith, Craig" <craig.d.smith@siemens•com>,
	paulus@samba•org,
	linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:06:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <424177FB.7090101@mrv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050322175815.GB7846@logos.cnet>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3299 bytes --]



Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:57:08PM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
>  
>
>>On Mar 22, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I'm quite puzzled. Why v2.6 calls the "tlbie" instruction 100-or-so
>>>less times than v2.4 ?
>>>      
>>>
>
>That was rather a _factor_ of "100-or-so" less.
>
>  
>
>>Oh my ...  I'm more worried about the high number of TLB misses
>>in 2.6 compared to 2.4.  That's really bad.  
>>    
>>
>
>Newbie question: What prevents the initial kernel map (tuple of 8Mbyte I/D-TLB entries) 
>and the IMMR 8Mbyte D-TLB entry from getting unmapped by translation pressure,
>in case CONFIG_PIN_TLB is disabled ? 
>
>  
>
>>How did you instrument the tlbie measurement? 
>>    
>>
>
>By a counter at the end of _tlbie function, similar to other counters which 
>you suggested.
>
>  
>
>>It could be that 2.4 used lots more 'tlbia' which were replaced by tlbie in 2.6.
>>    
>>
>
>Dont think thats the case given that v2.4 calls tlbia through flush_tlb_mm() at exit_mmap() 
>only. And at vmalloc_free which shouldnt be called at all.
>
>I just noticed this conditional at switch_mm() (v2.6), which _can_ partly 
>explain the reduced tlbie's  (its just a guess for now, though):
>
>static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
>                             struct task_struct *tsk)
>{
>#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
>        asm volatile (
> BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>        "dssall;\n"
>#ifndef CONFIG_POWER4
>         "sync;\n" /* G4 needs a sync here, G5 apparently not */
>#endif
> END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC)
>         : : );
>#endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */
>                                                                                            
>        tsk->thread.pgdir = next->pgd;
>                                                                                            
>        /* No need to flush userspace segments if the mm doesnt change */
>	if (prev == next) 				<--------------
>		return;   				<--------------
>                                                                                            
>        /* Setup new userspace context */
>        get_mmu_context(next);
>        set_context(next->context, next->pgd);
>}
>
>I'm about to disable it and retry.
>
>Spent part of the day reading the MMU section of 860 manual, I think I have kind 
>of a clue how things are supposed to work at the lowlevel now. 
>
>I'll continue tracking it down - any help is appreciated.
>
>PS: I can't reproduce the invalid TLB crash anymore. i.e. even by removing
>the _tlbie() at update_mmu_cache() everything is working as expected.
>
>How can I reproduce it again? Guillaume, what kernel version are you using?
>
>  
>
It is very timing dependant. Running 2.6.11, ldconfig crashes in 
__flush_dcache_icache(...) just after boot time (first time called). 
Unfortunatly, it only happens every now and then. And of course, never 
when my BDI2000 is plugged in. :(

I also noticed that with kernel preemption disable, oops are less 
frequent. Probably does not mean anything anyway...

Guillaume.


-- 
=======================================
Guillaume Autran
Senior Software Engineer
MRV Communications, Inc.
Tel: (978) 952-4932 office
E-mail: gautran@mrv•com
======================================= 


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4130 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-23 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-21 11:59 Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status Smith, Craig
2004-09-21 11:53 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-21 16:54   ` Dan Malek
2004-09-21 17:03 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-22 11:09   ` Sam Song
2004-10-15 15:49   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-16  2:13     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-16  9:08       ` Sam Song
2004-10-18  5:59         ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-10-18  6:22           ` Sam Song
2004-10-18  3:10     ` Dan Malek
2005-02-10 15:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-10 19:26     ` Dan Malek
2005-02-10 17:06       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-10 17:08         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-21 21:45           ` Guillaume Autran
2005-03-21 21:53             ` Robert P. J. Day
2005-03-22 13:04             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-22 20:57               ` Dan Malek
2005-03-22 17:58                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-22 22:53                   ` Dan Malek
2005-03-23 10:25                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-23 16:12                       ` Dan Malek
2005-03-23 16:05                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-24 14:05                           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-03-23 14:06                   ` Guillaume Autran [this message]
2005-02-11  3:42         ` Dan Malek
2005-02-21 21:12       ` Armin Schindler
2005-02-21 23:45         ` Guillaume Autran
2005-02-15  9:39     ` Reading of RTC robin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-22 11:20 Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status Joakim Tjernlund
2004-10-25 15:00 Sam Song
2004-09-17 13:57 Smith, Craig
2004-09-17 13:50 ` Pantelis Antoniou
     [not found] <20040916201505.E723B2BDB2@ozlabs.org>
2004-09-17 10:06 ` Song Sam
2004-09-17  9:55   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-18 20:11     ` Song Sam
2004-09-20  6:02       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-20 11:47         ` Song Sam
2004-09-20 17:49     ` Tom Rini
2004-09-20 18:02       ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-09-20 18:17         ` Tom Rini
2004-09-21  1:38       ` Song Sam
2004-09-21  6:12         ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-21 10:35           ` Song Sam
2004-09-21 10:41             ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-10-15 15:47               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-16 18:56 Smith, Craig
2004-09-16 20:07 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-17  5:43   ` Pantelis Antoniou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=424177FB.7090101@mrv.com \
    --to=gautran@mrv$(echo .)com \
    --cc=craig.d.smith@siemens$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades$(echo .)com \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox