From: Andrey Volkov <avolkov@varma-el•com>
To: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru•mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: PCI support under 2.6.11.4 on MPC8272ADS ???
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:32:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42442110.9020506@varma-el.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42441B13.7080703@ru.mvista.com>
Hi Vitaly
Same bug, as I describe early ( for MPC5200 )
+ /* Enable PCI */
+ immap->im_pci.pci_gcr = cpu_to_le32(PCIGCR_PCI_BUS_EN);
+ {
+ /* give it some time */
+ int i;
+ for(i=0;i<100;i++)
+ udelay(100);
+ }
Delay must be up to 1 sec (if you follow PCI standart :), not 10 msec.
--
Regards
Andrey Volkov
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> Hi Walt,
>
> Well, the incorrect VendorID almost clearly points to the incompatible
> PCI bus frequency - try to set it to 33Mhz.
> AFAIR, I saw my network card as video adapter in the lspci output.
>
> The 2.4 stuff was tested rather thoroughly. The current 2.6.11 support
> is examined with HPT370 and PDC20268 PCI IDE.
>
> You may also try my latest patch to the stock linux 2.5.
>
> Wimer, Walt wrote:
>
>>Using Vitaly's 2.4-based patch below as a starting point, I've been
>>adding PCI support to 2.6.11.4 for the MPC8272ADS board.
>>
>>The good news is that I think I have PCI interrupts pretty well sorted
>>out, and I see *something* half-way reasonable from "lspci".
>>
>>The bad news is that neither of the ethernet cards that I'm trying will
>>actually work, and I see some very weird behavior with PCI configuration
>>space:
>>
>> Card 1: Some Realtek RTL8139D-based card
>> Card 2: NETGEAR FA311 (National Semi DP83815 chip)
>>
>>With either card installed alone, both U-Boot and my kernel identify the
>>cards correctly in PCI configuration space.
>>
>>With *both* cards installed, both U-Boot and my kernel see the Realtek-
>>based card correctly, but the NETGEAR card has a corrupted Vendor ID
>>(e.g. 0x1000 or 0x1003 instead of the correct 0x100b). This happens
>>regardless of which PCI slots I use for the cards (I've tried virtually
>>every combination). This smells of a power problem or something to me.
>>
>>And again, even with either card alone, the drivers have serious
>>problems talking to the cards. I get various error messages from
>>the drivers and I see badly mangled packets on the wire. It's also
>>not uncommon for the whole system to freeze...
>>
>>Has anyone else seen similar behavior?
>>
>>Has anyone had success with PCI on this board (under any kernel
>>version)?
>>
>>
>>Any ideas / data points are appreciated.
>>
>>
>>Thanks!!!
>>
>>Walt Wimer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>This patch adds PCI bridge support for MPC8272 and PQ2FADS to the
>>>current linuxppc-2.4 tree. Actually it has been tested with 8272, but
>>>PQ2 _should_ also work, though it will complain that host bridge ID is
>>>unrecognized.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug at ru.mvista.com>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Sincerely, Vitaly
>>>
>>>-------------- next part --------------
>>>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>>Name: pq2-pci.patch
>>>Type: text/x-patch
>>>Size: 20111 bytes
>>>Desc: not available
>>>Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050218/12060ce8/pq2-pci.bin
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Vitaly
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-25 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-24 22:53 PCI support under 2.6.11.4 on MPC8272ADS ??? Wimer, Walt
2005-03-25 12:11 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-03-25 14:07 ` Vitaly Bordug
2005-03-25 14:32 ` Andrey Volkov [this message]
2005-03-29 16:01 ` Walter L. Wimer III
2005-03-29 16:41 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-03-29 8:38 ` Clemens Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42442110.9020506@varma-el.com \
--to=avolkov@varma-el$(echo .)com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=vbordug@ru$(echo .)mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox