public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas S." <thomas@schnuerer-online•de>
To: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale•com>
Cc: thomas.schnuerer@men•de,
	linuxppc-embedded list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: [linuxppc] 2.6.12-3 header <asm/usb.h> missing ?
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:44:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FA5932.4070002@schnuerer-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 75E0EACF-3C16-45AE-A0D2-CE999AF9AC7B@freescale.com

Kumar,

thanks for the Info, that helps. Do you know if in this kernel Version 
the MPC5200 USB Bug is already handled?

I refer to errata document MPC5200E.pdf (I think rev. 06/2005) in which 
its stated that the frame_no and pad1 words are swapped in the 
processors OHCI Area. I saw in some earlier 2.4 kernel that in 
/drivers/usb/host/ohci.h the members frame_no and pad1 of struct 
ohci_hcca were swapped. maybe thats not necessary anymore ?

Im using this driver to support our embedded system modules equipped 
with the 5200 (see the EM1 board on www.men.de for specs).

regards,
Thomas


Kumar Gala wrote:
> Well for the 5200 Thomas should be using include/linux/fsl_devices.h
> 
> If/when 4xx coverts over to platform devices we could have an  
> equivalent include file if truly needed.
> 
> - kumar
> 
> On Aug 9, 2005, at 11:58 AM, John Otken wrote:
> 
>> My patch to add on-chip OHCI support to the 440EP adds
>> an asm/usb.h reference to 4xx/ibm440ep.c.  Thomas may
>> also require it for his MPC5200 mods.
>>
>> I don't like small include files either.  Perhaps there
>> is an existing file where struct usb_hcd_platform_data
>> can live.  Any suggestions?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>>> Why are we bothering with asm-ppc/usb.h anyways?
>>>
>>> The structure defn only appears to be used once.  If this is  true,  why
>>> not just define it in the .c file.
>>>
>>> - kumar
>>>
>>> On Aug 9, 2005, at 7:19 AM, John Otken wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Google found it for me.  It is in my "Support 440EP
>>>> On-Chip OHCI USB Host Controller" patch:
>>>>
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=1965
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff -uprN a/include/asm-ppc/usb.h b/include/asm-ppc/usb.h
>>>> --- a/include/asm-ppc/usb.h    1969-12-31 17:00:00.000000000 -0700
>>>> +++ b/include/asm-ppc/usb.h    2005-08-05 06:13:58.000000000 -0500
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * ppc/usb.h:
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +#ifndef _PPC_USB_H
>>>> +#define _PPC_USB_H
>>>> +
>>>> +struct usb_hcd_platform_data {
>>>> +    int (*start) (struct platform_device *pdev);
>>>> +    void (*stop) (struct platform_device *pdev);
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif /* !(_PPC_USB_H) */
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Thomas S." <thomas@schnuerer-online•de>
>>>>>> Date: August 8, 2005 4:48:03 PM CDT
>>>>>> To: <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>
>>>>>> Subject: [linuxppc] 2.6.12-3 header <asm/usb.h> missing ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Im using Kernel PPC on a MPC5200 board and try to use the onChip
>>>>>> USB. In
>>>>>> file /drivers/usb/host/ohci-ppc-soc.c a file <asm/usb.h> is  included
>>>>>> which seems to be missing. I cant find it anywhere , any ideas ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
>>>>>> kernel"
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger•kernel.org
>>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
>>>>> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
>>>>> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-10 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <42F7D313.4020109@schnuerer-online.de>
2005-08-09  4:30 ` Fwd: [linuxppc] 2.6.12-3 header <asm/usb.h> missing ? Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 12:19   ` John Otken
2005-08-09 14:50     ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-09 16:26       ` Eugene Surovegin
2005-08-09 16:58       ` John Otken
2005-08-09 18:42         ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-10 19:44           ` Thomas S. [this message]
2005-08-10 19:53             ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-10 23:20             ` Dale Farnsworth
2005-08-09 18:26       ` Dale Farnsworth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42FA5932.4070002@schnuerer-online.de \
    --to=thomas@schnuerer-online$(echo .)de \
    --cc=kumar.gala@freescale$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=thomas.schnuerer@men$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox