Subject: Re: 2.6.14 USB vs. sleep issues

From: Vivenzio Pagliari <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 20:32:04 +0100

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> I would say your first mistake is to use PREEMPT :) There are various
> issues with PREEMPT on ppc32 that have not really been addressed so far,
> and the USB code has some "holes" that I wouldn't trust in a PREEMPT
> environment.
> 

What do you mean exactly? Should CONFIG_PREEMPT not be used?
And what about CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY?

Vivenzio