public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hawkins <dwh@ovro•caltech.edu>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel•crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian?
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:04:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E0F81F.4050005@ovro.caltech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060201104405.C16064@cox.net>

Matt,

In the same vein as the readl()/writel() question, what
are the assumptions regarding memcpy_toio and memcpy_fromio?

If the memcpy_to/fromio operations are intended only
for access to PCI devices, then they should also inherently
perform little-endianness conversion. For the test driver
I was working on, I did *not* find this the case, eg.
I implemented the test driver read() and write() using the
memcpy_to/fromio calls, and the data transfers occur
in big-endian (well, 'native' mode, since I also test the
same test driver with the PCI adapter in an x86 system).

If memcpy_to/fromio can be used in a more general context,
then I can see why they operate in native mode.

Just looking for enlightenment.

Cheers
Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-01 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-01 11:19 Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian? Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 17:02 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 17:44   ` Matt Porter
2006-02-01 17:53     ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:04     ` David Hawkins [this message]
2006-02-01 18:11       ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 18:20         ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:23           ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 21:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02  0:54       ` Kumar Gala
2006-02-02  3:07         ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02  8:09         ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02  9:08           ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 17:34             ` Dale Farnsworth
2006-02-02 14:21           ` Matt Porter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-01 18:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 20:35 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-02  9:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-02  9:46 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 14:37   ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02 17:45     ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 18:16       ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43E0F81F.4050005@ovro.caltech.edu \
    --to=dwh@ovro$(echo .)caltech.edu \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=mporter@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox