public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Zeffertt <ajz@cambridgebroadband•com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale•com>, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: local_irq_save not masking interrupts
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:17:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45195296.8000405@cambridgebroadband.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45194F1F.7030003@freescale.com>

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your reply.  Comments below.

Scott Wood wrote:
> Alex Zeffertt wrote:
>> Well, mpc832xemds_phy_interrupt_enable() does nothing except call
>> request_irq(,,SA_SHIRQ,,).  I suspect that request_irq() is somehow
>> reenabling interrupts, but I can't see where it might be doing so.
> 
> One possibile way (in 2.6.18; I'm assuming 2.6.11 is similar) is that 
> request_irq() calls setup_irq(), which calls register_irq_proc() and 
> register_handler_proc(), both of which call proc_mkdir(), which 
> eventually calls proc_create(), which calls kmalloc() with GFP_KERNEL. 
> This is probably a bug, since request_irq itself uses GFP_ATOMIC, 
> indicating an intent for request_irq() to be safely callable in atomic 
> context.
> 

I agree this indicates an intent to make it atomic, but I don't see how
this could cause interrupts to become re-enabled during the request_irq()
call.  Also, since I am calling request_irq at insmod time, i.e. in process
context, both GFP_ flags *should* work.

> Can you disable the interrupts at the device level until the handler is 
> in place, and thus avoid the need to disable IRQs at all?
> 
> -Scott

Yup, I've come to the same conclusion.  I now, for each shared interrupt:

* initialise all the devices which share the interrupt, turning interrupt generation off

* register all handlers for each device which shares the interrupt

* turn interrupt generation back on for each device.

This avoids the original problem, but it does not explain it.  I still
can't see how I can get an interrupt on line 3 below:

1.         local_irq_save(flags);
2.         request_irq(MPC83xx_IRQ_EXT6, handler, SA_SHIRQ, "name", dev1);
3.
4.         request_irq(MPC83xx_IRQ_EXT6, handler, SA_SHIRQ, "name", dev2);
5          local_irq_restore(flags);

Regards,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-26 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-26 10:00 local_irq_save not masking interrupts Alex Zeffertt
2006-09-26 10:19 ` Liu Dave-r63238
2006-09-26 10:28   ` Alex Zeffertt
2006-09-26 16:02     ` Scott Wood
2006-09-26 16:17       ` Alex Zeffertt [this message]
2006-09-26 16:27         ` Scott Wood
2006-09-26 16:42           ` Alex Zeffertt
2006-09-26 16:52             ` Scott Wood
2006-09-27 16:52 ` Esben Nielsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45195296.8000405@cambridgebroadband.com \
    --to=ajz@cambridgebroadband$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox