public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace•com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale•com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: [dtc] Add support for flat device tree format version 17
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:11:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F864E8.40501@smiths-aerospace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45F863DF.5050709@freescale.com>

Timur Tabi wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
>> libfdt defined a new version of the flattened device tree format,
>> version 17.  It is backwards compatible with version 16, just adding
>> an extra header field giving the size of the blob's structure blob.
> 
> Question:
> 
> Since the DTB is compatible with V16, then technically U-Boot can work with it.  What 
> would happen if U-Boot added some nodes to the DTB, but it didn't update size_dt_struct? 
> Would the value of size_dt_struct still be correct?  If not, then does that mean that 
> U-Boot should reject V17 DTBs?

Ahh, now I see your concern and don't know the answer at this point.

The best solution, which I'm making progress on but slowly, is to pull 
David Gibson's libfdt utilities into u-boot and use them to manipulate 
the tree.  I very much want v17 blobs because that removes my 
"write-in-place" restrictions on changing the properties.

gvb

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-14 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-13  6:22 [dtc] Add support for flat device tree format version 17 David Gibson
2007-03-13 21:10 ` Mark A. Greer
2007-03-14  0:02   ` David Gibson
2007-03-14 21:06 ` Timur Tabi
2007-03-14 21:11   ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2007-03-14 21:20     ` Timur Tabi
2007-03-14 23:07       ` David Gibson
2007-03-14 21:41     ` Timur Tabi
2007-03-15  1:32       ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-03-15  1:37         ` Timur Tabi
2007-03-15  2:49           ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-03-15  1:38         ` David Gibson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-14  0:02 David Gibson
2007-03-14 15:32 ` Timur Tabi
2007-03-14 20:41 ` Jon Loeliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F864E8.40501@smiths-aerospace.com \
    --to=gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=timur@freescale$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox