public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa•com>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram•es>
Cc: ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: "atomic" 64-bit math on 32-bit ppc's?
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:31:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46DD500B.4020207@genesi-usa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070904113937.GA3994@iram.es>


Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:09:22PM +0100, Matt Sealey wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> The Solaris PPC code drop included most of these functions for 32-bit ops on
>> 32-bit PPC architectures but the 64-bit operations are not present. What I
>> a not clear on is the operation of lwarx and stwcx. and if they will work if
>> you are doing operations on two words at a time.
> 
> No. There is a single reservation for a single word.

This is what I gathered from the programming environments manual at least.

> the 64 bit operations inside a spinlock on PPC32, and then select the
> number /location of spinlock(s) based on your needs, from one global
> per machine to one per 64 bit variable if you find excessive contention.

Okay that makes sense, but it would have to be a super global big lock,
I don't think the code is there in ZFS to give every 64-bit variable it's
own dedicated spinlock (kind of an overhaul) and I'm trying to be fast..

-- 
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa•com>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-04 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-04 11:09 "atomic" 64-bit math on 32-bit ppc's? Matt Sealey
2007-09-04 11:39 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-09-04 12:31   ` Matt Sealey [this message]
2007-09-04 16:02     ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-09-04 17:40       ` Matt Sealey
2007-09-05  1:04     ` David Gibson
2007-09-04 18:48   ` Scott Wood
2007-09-06 13:21     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-06 13:43       ` Scott Wood
2007-09-06 14:09         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-10 20:39           ` Jon Loeliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46DD500B.4020207@genesi-usa.com \
    --to=matt@genesi-usa$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=paubert@iram$(echo .)es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox