public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru•mvista.com>
To: benh@kernel•crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx•de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia board support
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:36:35 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47068433.7060803@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186144536.5981.5.camel@gruick>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> Depends on interpretation. IIRC currently the same die is used for 440EPx and 
>> 440GRx. I could be wrong here though and it is just a bug in the chip. But 
>> anyway we should support this somehow. Could be that I missed this in the 
>> current 440GRx (Rainier) arch/ppc support too. I have to admit, that no 
>> clever solution comes to my mind right away though.
> 
> We can always come up with some kind of runtime detection, by turning on
> MSR:FP, issuing an fp instruction and catching the illegal instruction
> fault if any :-)
> 
> Ben.
> 
> 

Is it OK to workaround the GRX/EPX having the same PVR issue using 
device tree?
Say, check the PVR value and if we have 440EPx PVR, but 440GRX node in 
the device tree, fix the cputable entry and omit FPU initialization code.
Thanks,
Valentine.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-05 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-30 15:16 [PATCH 5/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia board support Valentine Barshak
2007-08-01  2:15 ` David Gibson
2007-08-01  5:01   ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-01  5:05     ` David Gibson
2007-08-02 20:32       ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-03  8:39         ` Kumar Gala
2007-08-03 12:57           ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-02 20:34 ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-03  6:44   ` Stefan Roese
2007-08-03 11:36     ` Valentine Barshak
2007-08-03 12:25       ` Stefan Roese
2007-08-03 12:35         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-05 18:36           ` Valentine Barshak [this message]
2007-10-05 22:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-03 11:20   ` Valentine Barshak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47068433.7060803@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=vbarshak@ru$(echo .)mvista.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=sr@denx$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox