Subject: Re: lseek() on entries in /proc/device-tree returns EINVAL

From: Timur Tabi <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:16:04 -0500

Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

> Good, bb should probably do the same. I just hope Al will allow a grace period and restore
> the old behavior so bb can catch up.

I don't see any reason why lseek() should not always work.  Besides, a "grace
period" would mean that on some future kernel, older busybox will not work.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale