Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support

From: Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:00:50 -0400

Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> 
> On Monday 16 June 2008 18:34, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:02AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Monday 26 May 2008 11:53, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> Port the fs_enet driver to support the MDIO on GPIO driver for PHY
>>>> access in addition to the mii-bitbang driver.
>>> Now that 1/2 has been applied by Jeff, could this one make it to 
>>> powerpc-next ?
>> This patch should probably go through Jeff as well...
> 
> Jeff, what's your opinion on this ?
> 
>> Acked-by: Scott Wood <[email-masked]>
>>
>>>> -	data = of_get_property(phynode, "reg", &len);
>>>> -	if (!data || len != 4)
>>>> -		goto out_put_mdio;
>>>> +	bus_id = of_get_gpio(mdionode, 0);
>>>> +	if (bus_id < 0) {
>>>> +		struct resource res;
>>>> +		ret = of_address_to_resource(mdionode, 0, &res);
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			goto out_put_mdio;
>>>> +		bus_id = res.start;
>>>> +	}
>>>>  
>>>> -	snprintf(fpi->bus_id, 16, "%x:%02x", res.start, *data);
>>>> +	snprintf(fpi->bus_id, 16, "%x:%02x", bus_id, *data);

What are the patch dependencies, if any?

My general rule is, anytime I see 80%+ of the patch dealing with 
arch-specific API functions (such as OF resource stuff), I tend to 
prefer that goes via an arch tree.

If it's a networking change, of course I'd prefer it came in my direction.

	Jeff