Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] task_pt_regs for powerpc systems

From: Timur Tabi <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:21:38 -0500

Srinivasa D S wrote:

> +#define task_pt_regs(tsk)	(tsk)->thread.regs

Shouldn't this be:

	#define task_pt_regs(tsk)	((tsk)->thread.regs)

just to be safe?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale