Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

From: Matt Sealey <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:32:52 -0500

Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:04 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>> Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>>> What do the device tree deities have to say about PWM support?
>> Dunno.  What lists are they on?  :)
>>
> 
> Perhaps [email-masked] too.

I thought this was what ePAPR was for.

Why would it need all that discussion if it's being codified into
a proper standard? Someone should just submit a reasonable extension
to a reasonable extension-managing body :)

-- 
Matt Sealey <[email-masked]>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations