From: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa•com>
To: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks•com>,
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa•com>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org>,
devicetree-discuss list <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: GPIO - marking individual pins (not) available in device tree
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:14:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <490248C2.9020104@genesi-usa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081024044511.GI4267@yookeroo.seuss>
David Gibson wrote:
> Don't be patronising.
>
> There is an existing address space defined by the gpio binding.
> Defining another one is pointless redundancy. This is standard good
> ideas in computer science, no further argument necessary.
The existing address space, and the patches Anton etc. just submitted
which I started this discussion to address, don't fulfil certain needs.
You could do better than call it insane, by describing how you would
define a gpio bank that used 3 seperate pins which are NOT together
in a register, using a base address (reg) and base property (offset
of first pin) with the current system?
--
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa•com>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 21:32 GPIO - marking individual pins (not) available in device tree Matt Sealey
2008-10-23 22:22 ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-23 23:05 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 0:52 ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-24 3:29 ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 4:17 ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-24 4:45 ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 22:14 ` Matt Sealey [this message]
2008-10-26 23:47 ` David Gibson
2008-10-27 15:40 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 18:34 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-27 18:56 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 20:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-27 21:56 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 23:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-27 23:40 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 0:47 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 1:11 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 2:37 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 16:53 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 17:39 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 19:46 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 0:15 ` David Gibson
2008-10-28 0:51 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 1:50 ` David Gibson
2008-10-28 5:20 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-24 22:03 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 22:20 ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2008-10-26 21:39 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 23:44 ` Mitch Bradley
2008-10-26 21:13 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-26 23:53 ` David Gibson
2008-10-27 16:12 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 16:35 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-27 17:05 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 17:25 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-27 17:49 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-27 17:54 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-28 0:38 ` David Gibson
2008-10-28 0:34 ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 4:58 ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 3:27 ` David Gibson
2008-10-24 16:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-24 17:01 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-24 22:17 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-24 22:37 ` Anton Vorontsov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-28 13:31 Konstantinos Margaritis
2008-10-28 14:11 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-28 14:15 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 17:06 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-28 17:32 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-28 23:37 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=490248C2.9020104@genesi-usa.com \
--to=matt@genesi-usa$(echo .)com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=wmb@firmworks$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox