public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks•com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k•org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips•org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de•ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	linux-s390@vger•kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat•com,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx•de>,
	x86@kernel•org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat•com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo•org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic•park.msu.ru>,
	linux390@de•ibm.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle•net>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel•com>,
	linux-parisc@vger•kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation•org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips•org,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin•ca>,
	linux-alpha@vger•kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de•ibm.com>,
	uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin•uclinux.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation•org,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp•panasonic.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Add support for GCC-4.5's __builtin_unreachable() to compiler.h
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:40:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAE63E7.90909@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f740e80909120022m72ad5ea7t692fba93cd3114e9@mail.gmail.com>

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 17:58, David Daney<ddaney@caviumnetworks•com> wrote:
>> Michael Buesch wrote:
>>> On Friday 11 September 2009 01:56:42 David Daney wrote:
>>>> +/* Unreachable code */
>>>> +#ifndef unreachable
>>>> +# define unreachable() do { for (;;) ; } while (0)
>>>> +#endif
>>> # define unreachable() do { } while (1)
>>>
>>> ? :)
>> Clearly I was not thinking clearly when I wrote that part.  RTH noted the
>> same thing.  I will fix it.
> 
> However, people are so used to seeing the `do { } while (0)' idiom,
> that they might miss
> there's a `1' here, not a `0'.
> 
> So perhaps it's better to use plain `for (;;)' for infinite loops?
> 

I don't think so.  The only valid token that can follow 'do { } while 
(1)' is ';', any statement may follow 'for (;;)', so there is a greater 
possibility to silently screw things up with the for(;;) form.

David Daney

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-10 23:54 [PATCH 00/10] Add support for GCC's __builtin_unreachable() and use it in BUG David Daney
2009-09-10 23:56 ` [PATCH 01/10] Add support for GCC-4.5's __builtin_unreachable() to compiler.h David Daney
2009-09-11  0:14   ` Richard Henderson
2009-09-11 14:32   ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-11 15:58     ` David Daney
2009-09-12  7:22       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-09-14 15:40         ` David Daney [this message]
2009-09-10 23:56 ` [PATCH 07/10] powerpc: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() David Daney
2009-09-24  3:37 ` [PATCH 00/10] Add support for GCC's __builtin_unreachable() and use it in BUG Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AAE63E7.90909@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=deller@gmx$(echo .)de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k$(echo .)org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hskinnemoen@atmel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic$(echo .)park.msu.ru \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-am33-list@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips$(echo .)org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle$(echo .)net \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin$(echo .)uclinux.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo$(echo .)org \
    --cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=yasutake.koichi@jp$(echo .)panasonic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox