public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger•com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab•ca>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff•org>,
	Devicetree-discuss@lists•ozlabs.org,
	Linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org, Linux-i2c@vger•kernel.org,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx•de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:49:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7B04EA.9010707@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa41002161040kada217ds1f63d363157e08ab@mail.gmail.com>

Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger•com> wrote:
>> From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx•de>
>>
>> "__devinit[data]" has not yet been used for all initialization functions
>> and data. To avoid truncating lines, the struct "mpc_i2c_match_data" has
>> been renamed to "mpc_i2c_data", which is even the better name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx•de>
>> Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix•de>
> 
> Between patch 1 & 2 is not bisectable.  Functions still called
> *_setclock in this patch, but referenced as *_setup in the structure.
> Please respin.

Argh, sorry for the mess. I will fix it tomorrow.

> Also ...
> 
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data mpc_i2c_data_52xx __devinitdata = {
>> +       .setup = mpc_i2c_setup_52xx,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data mpc_i2c_data_8313 __devinitdata = {
>> +       .setup = mpc_i2c_setup_8xxx,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data mpc_i2c_data_8543 __devinitdata = {
>> +       .setup = mpc_i2c_setup_8xxx,
>> +       .prescaler = 2,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct mpc_i2c_data mpc_i2c_data_8544 __devinitdata = {
>> +       .setup = mpc_i2c_setup_8xxx,
>> +       .prescaler = 3,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const struct of_device_id mpc_i2c_of_match[] = {
>> -       {.compatible = "mpc5200-i2c",
>> -        .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -                       .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> -               },
>> -       },
>> -       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c",
>> -        .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -                       .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> -               },
>> -       },
>> -       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c",
>> -        .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -                       .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
>> -               },
>> -       },
>> -       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-i2c",
>> -        .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -                       .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> -               },
>> -       },
>> -       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c",
>> -        .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -                       .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> -                       .prescaler = 2,
>> -               },
>> -       },
>> -       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c",
>> -        .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
>> -                       .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
>> -                       .prescaler = 3,
>> -               },
>> +       {.compatible = "mpc5200-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
>> +       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
>> +       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
>> +       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8313, },
>> +       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8543, },
>> +       {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8544, },
> 
> ... what was wrong with the old format of declaring the .data
> structures inline with the match table?

It does not allow to use __devinitdata because the space reserved by the
compiler does belong to another section. In other words it was necessary
to get ride of section mismatches.

Wolfgang.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-16 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-10 14:55 [PATCH v7 0/4] i2c-mpc: add support for the Freescale MPC512x and other fixes Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-10 14:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-10 14:55   ` [PATCH v7 2/4] i2c-mpc: rename "setclock" initialization functions to "setup" Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-10 14:55     ` [PATCH v7 3/4] i2c-mpc: add support for the MPC512x processors from Freescale Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-10 14:55       ` [PATCH v7 4/4] powerpc: doc/dts-bindings: update doc of FSL I2C bindings Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-16 18:40   ` [PATCH v7 1/4] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data Grant Likely
2010-02-16 20:49     ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2010-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] i2c-mpc: add support for the Freescale MPC512x and other fixes Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7B04EA.9010707@grandegger.com \
    --to=wg@grandegger$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Devicetree-discuss@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=Linux-i2c@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff$(echo .)org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=wg@denx$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox