Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/85xx: Rename PowerPC core nodes to match other e500mc based .dts

From: Scott Wood <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:42:40 -0500

On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other
> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc.  Use the core name to be
> consistent going forward.

Why are we not using the generic names recommendation?

Is the "PowerPC" vendor string still appropriate here, or should we use
"fsl"?

-Scott