Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt/powerpc: Use of_get_child_by_name to get a named child.

From: Srinivas KANDAGATLA <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:15:08 +0100

My bad...
Will skip this patch in next patch-set...

On 14/09/12 14:06, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 03:18 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email-masked]>
>>
>> As follow-up to "dt: introduce of_get_child_by_name to get child node by
>> name." patch, This patch removes some of the code duplication in the
>> driver by replacing it with of_get_child_by_name instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c |    5 +----
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> index f191bf0..80e5b6c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> @@ -735,7 +735,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>>   */
>>  struct device_node *of_find_next_cache_node(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>> -	struct device_node *child;
>>  	const phandle *handle;
>>  
>>  	handle = of_get_property(np, "l2-cache", NULL);
>> @@ -749,9 +748,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_next_cache_node(struct device_node *np)
>>  	 * beneath CPU nodes.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (!strcmp(np->type, "cpu"))
>> -		for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
>> -			if (!strcmp(child->type, "cache"))
> name and type are not the same thing.
>
> Rob
>
>> -				return child;
>> +		return of_get_child_by_name(np, "cache");
>>  
>>  	return NULL;
>>  }
>>
>
>